Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Onder 1.4 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:1394.

16. In view of the above, it is hardly surprising that in these cassation proceedings the defence has once again taken issue with the investigation of the facts by the Court of Appeal, its selection and evaluation of the available evidentiary material and to what extent it considered or failed to consider the reliability of the witness testimony. With the exception of the 30th ground of appeal in cassation, all the grounds of appeal raise objections to the judicial findings of fact and/or the Court of Appeal’s decisions refusing investigation requests. In view of the history of the case, it comes as no surprise that the grounds of appeal in cassation repeatedly test the boundaries of what evidentiary decisions can be reviewed in cassation proceedings.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 32564 tot 33404.