Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Onder 1.4 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:1394.

'[..] in cassation proceedings [..] it is [not] possible to examine whether the court [..] which has held the charges to be proven on the basis of its factual assessment of the evidentiary material was right to have formed that opinion or whether the facts and circumstances held to have been established by the court [ ...] in its explanation of its assessment of the evidence are correct. This is also true of the conclusions of a factual nature which the court has drawn from the facts and circumstances contained in the evidence. [...] in cassation proceedings, the only criterion by which such findings and conclusions can be assessed is comprehensibility (cf. Supreme Court 18 September 2001, ECLI:NL:HR:2001:AD3530).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 33890 tot 34626.