Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Alinea 211 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:1394.

375. In my view, this conclusion that a foreign amnesty arrangement does not, as a rule, bar a Dutch prosecution seals the fate of the 30th ground of appeal in cassation. The complaints made in the ground of appeal and its explanatory notes relate to the Court of Appeal’s finding that the amnesty scheme is no longer valid under Liberian law and/or its finding that the application of the Liberian amnesty scheme in the present case would be contrary to international law. The submissions are therefore all based on the view that if the Liberian amnesty scheme is in force and not contrary to international law it can be applied in the present Dutch criminal case and can therefore be an obstacle to declaring that the prosecution instituted by the Public Prosecution Service is admissible. As I have said, I consider this interpretation of the law to be incorrect.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 2f8d7e5e67c92c2184978342161b8b6e7ef94ed287abf25732436ec23badffee, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 94619 tot 95500.