Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 23 maart 2018
Onder 3.25 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 23 maart 2018
Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 23 maart 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:263.
Under Dutch law an arbitral award may be quashed on, inter alia, grounds of public order interests. In the present case the applicants have challenged the arbitral award on these grounds before the Dutch courts, stating that there were ascertainable facts which showed that one of the arbitrators gave the appearance of lacking independence and impartiality. The Supreme Court, however, decided that an arbitral award could only be quashed as being contrary to public order interests if either facts and circumstances had been revealed on the ground of which it had to be assumed that the arbitrator had in fact not been independent or impartial, or the doubts as regards his independence or impartiality were so grave that the disadvantaged party could not be required to accept the arbitral award. Since the circumstances were not such in the present case, the Supreme Court rejected the applicant's appeal in cassation.
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afbd82d3db202b82cd2f3821c58fe57ba5deb9198276b8a35a315f6e33a242f8. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt afbd82d3db202b82cd2f3821c58fe57ba5deb9198276b8a35a315f6e33a242f8, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 99864 tot 100950.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afbd82d3db202b82cd2f3821c58fe57ba5deb9198276b8a35a315f6e33a242f8 | shasum -a 256