Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 mei 2018

Onder 2.30 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 mei 2018

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 mei 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:496.

“Insofar as the applicant complains that the Court of Appeal refused to take oral evidence from the USA Assistant Attorney Ms D. as she could have clarified issues in relation to the investigation carried out in the USA, the Court considers that the Convention does not preclude reliance, at the investigating stage, on information obtained by the investigating authorities from sources such as foreign criminal investigations. Nevertheless, the subsequent use of such information can raise issues under the Convention where there are reasons to assume that in this foreign investigation defence rights guaranteed in the Convention have been disrespected. However, the applicant has not substantiated in any way that such reasons existed in the instant case.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/93f0d55f7119a654bb9b09ffdb25bce1b2144afebe82c97b7b4f45c058fbfdc0. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 93f0d55f7119a654bb9b09ffdb25bce1b2144afebe82c97b7b4f45c058fbfdc0, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 55550 tot 56326.