Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2018

Onder 4.9 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2018

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2018, ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:688.

16. In practice, however, the distinction between a measure that constitutes a “penalty” and one that relates to the “enforcement” of a penalty is not always clear. For instance, the Court has accepted that the manner in which a set of prison regulations on the method of enforcing sentences had been construed and implemented vis-à-vis the penalty in question went beyond straightforward enforcement and thereby covered the actual scope of the sentence (Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], § 148, relating to a life sentence). Similarly, the extension of preventive detention by the sentence enforcement courts under legislation which had come into force after the applicant had committed the offence amounted to an “additional penalty” and therefore did not exclusively concern the enforcement of the penalty (M. v. Germany, § 135).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/18cb4fa9b44007fba28b197788d5504d3e170c222c344056056e028dfad37651. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 18cb4fa9b44007fba28b197788d5504d3e170c222c344056056e028dfad37651, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 74605 tot 75457.