Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 oktober 2019

Onder 3.28 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 oktober 2019

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 oktober 2019, ECLI:NL:PHR:2019:1192.

“52. Second, notwithstanding the foregoing and for the reasons we have given earlier in this judgment, we do not consider it to be an abuse of the process of this court for Samsung to make and pursue its central amendment applications. These are applications which are contemplated by the central amendment scheme as implemented in our domestic law by the 1977 Act. Moreover, and in contrast to an application made in this jurisdiction under s.75 for amendment of a UK designation, they do not involve the exercise by the EPO of any discretion. If the requirements of the Implementing Regulations are met, the amendments will be allowed. Further, and again unlike an application made in this jurisdiction for amendment of a UK designation, the amendments will take effect in relation to the patents in every designated state.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/fdf4206ff198b99f7fc5e4b5e139d1b84e8d521c128f42d2884801705226aa6b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt fdf4206ff198b99f7fc5e4b5e139d1b84e8d521c128f42d2884801705226aa6b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 48344 tot 49188.