Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 augustus 2019

Onder 2.7 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 augustus 2019

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 augustus 2019, ECLI:NL:PHR:2019:939.

In patent law terms, the existence of a combination of features, i.e. of a combination invention, is to be reviewed differently from the mere existence of partial problems, i.e. of an aggregation of features. According to current case law, partial problems exist if the features or sets of features of a claim are a mere aggregation of these features or sets of features (juxtaposition or collocation) which are not functionally interdependent , i.e. do not mutually influence each other to achieve a technical success over and above the sum of their repective individual effects, in contrast to what is assumend in case of a combination of features. What has to be established is whether each set of features is separately obvious in the light of the priort art ( T 389/86 , OJ 1988, 87; T 387/87 , T 294/90 , T 363/94 , T 926/11 ). (…)”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/147e2d5b2412bd352c8f3de3b452a4e422ebc741311c432e2bbeea49ab915701. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 147e2d5b2412bd352c8f3de3b452a4e422ebc741311c432e2bbeea49ab915701, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 71289 tot 72335.