Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 10 juli 2020
Onder 2.6 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 10 juli 2020
Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 10 juli 2020, ECLI:NL:PHR:2020:709.
120. However, the Court would emphasise that, having regard to the margin of appreciation which must be accorded to Contracting States in the matters of criminal justice and sentencing (see paragraphs 104 and 105 above), it is not its task to prescribe the form (executive or judicial) which that review should take. For the same reason, it is not for the Court to determine when that review should take place. This being said, the Court would also observe that the comparative and international law materials before it show clear support for the institution of a dedicated mechanism guaranteeing a review no later than twenty-five years after the imposition of a life sentence, with further periodic reviews thereafter (see paragraphs 117 and 118 above).
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/89b019e2aa59330df62eba37bb4ab2c674124bd5ded2b69933a595a1010045be. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 89b019e2aa59330df62eba37bb4ab2c674124bd5ded2b69933a595a1010045be, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 33827 tot 34652.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/89b019e2aa59330df62eba37bb4ab2c674124bd5ded2b69933a595a1010045be | shasum -a 256