Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022

Onder 3.20 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:PHR:2022:228.

“The Court has no doubt that the decision to extradite the applicant to Italy amounts to an interference with his right to respect for both his private and his family life. However, the Court considers that such interference may be regarded as complying with the requirements of the second paragraph of Article 8, namely as a measure “in accordance with the law”, pursuing the aims of the prevention of disorder and crime, as well as being “necessary in a democratic society” for those aims. Although the applicant’s removal from Germany would involve considerable hardship, the Court considers, taking into account the margin of appreciation left to the Contracting States in such circumstances (see the Boughanemi v. France judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports 1996 II, p. 610, § 41), that the decision to extradite the applicant was not disproportionate to the legitimate aims pursued. There is therefore no appearance of a violation of Article 8.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/28eb4fa46e4c092d3c48f4cb7b3aa1186ce4fdeb13b105472cf0893e3d48b059. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 28eb4fa46e4c092d3c48f4cb7b3aa1186ce4fdeb13b105472cf0893e3d48b059, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 54016 tot 54991.