Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022

Onder 4.47 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 11 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:PHR:2022:231.

39. In the present case the measure complained of by the applicant, namely his dismissal, was not taken by a State authority but by a private bank and was upheld by the domestic courts (see paragraphs 12 and 17 above). In those circumstances, the Court finds that it is appropriate to examine the application in terms of the positive obligations of the respondent State under Article 10 of the Convention. The Court will therefore ascertain whether, in the present case, the Hungarian judicial authorities, in dismissing the applicant’s claims, adequately secured his right to freedom of expression as guaranteed by Article 10 in the context of labour relations and balanced it against the employer’s right to protection of its commercial interests.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/a8612dcabe8afda449ad7da9944f03395580dff9f349fa83b875da2a5ccd7e77. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt a8612dcabe8afda449ad7da9944f03395580dff9f349fa83b875da2a5ccd7e77, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 73119 tot 73922.