Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 augustus 2022

Onder 5.20 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 augustus 2022

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 augustus 2022, ECLI:NL:PHR:2022:762.

78. The Court observes that the Bucharest Sector 1 District Court held in its judgment of 8 March 2011, upheld by the Bucharest County Court in its decision of 4 October 2011, that there had been no medical negligence on the part of the dentist. The district court concluded that the applicant’s condition was the result of her own negligence, as she had refused to have the faulty dental prosthetics permanently fixed. In this respect, the Court notes that these findings were in disagreement with the conclusions of the expert report issued on 4 December 2003 which had recommended the removal of the prosthetic dental work as it had been incorrectly and inadequately carried out by Dr A.D. (…). The Court further notes that the same court dismissed the civil complaint joint to the criminal proceedings holding that the conditions required to attract civil delictual liability had not been met in this case.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/620be9cae33bae5928d0b4b98a63c81f3956041bc22d10a647b7633a4f92ce61. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 620be9cae33bae5928d0b4b98a63c81f3956041bc22d10a647b7633a4f92ce61, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 143117 tot 144045.