Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 mei 2023

Onder 9.26 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 mei 2023

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 mei 2023, ECLI:NL:PHR:2023:491.

The above analysis would mean that there were no longer any supervisory directors as from 22 January 2002. Consequently, all decisions taken by the supervisory board with respect to annual accounts of [Holding] and the appointment of both [betrokkene 2] and of [betrokkene 3] would have been non-existent. However, this consequence runs counter to reality as [Holding] always has regarded [kind 1] , [kind 2] and [eiser] as supervisory directors until at least 30 October 2013 when a declaration was made that they had terminated their position as of that date (...). Actually, it was decided in item 5 of the 30 October 2013 supervisory board meeting to grant discharge to the supervisory board members for the entire years 2011 and 2012. Moreover, [betrokkene 2] had expressly proposed to nominate [eiser] as president of the supervisory board on 23 June 2010 (...). Finally (...) [kind 1] , [kind 2] and [eiser] considered all of them to be supervisory board members in the 2013 SA.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/ed6fa17c13c12a94c44f834643731a5ec6dd99d7ee5d080e85d8a4b988fadb61. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt ed6fa17c13c12a94c44f834643731a5ec6dd99d7ee5d080e85d8a4b988fadb61, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 17754 tot 18753.