Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2025

Onder 3.10 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2025

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2025, ECLI:NL:PHR:2025:554.

“32. In respect of [witnesses who cannot be located] the Court has repeatedly noted that the domestic courts with the assistance of the respective authorities have a wide array of measures to locate a missing witness. For example, inquiries with the relatives and acquaintances (see Klimentyev v. Russia , no. 46503/99, §§ 30 and 125, 16 November 2006), police searches, including international legal assistance (see Lučić v. Croatia , no. 5699/11, § 80, 27 February 2014), inquiries with prison registers, national police and Interpol databases (see Tseber v. the Czech Republic , no. 46203/08, § 50, 22 November 2012), civil register services and municipal councils ( Sică v. Romania , no. 12036/05, §§ 25 and 63, 9 July 2013), etc. It is not for the Court to compile a list of specific measures which the domestic courts must have taken in order to have made all reasonable efforts to secure the attendance of a witness whom they finally considered to be unreachable (see Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 121).”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/bb3e0900bb4afa55733df186a5ac2d4a1fbf48c73e1b7c4364f0fa2328c68be9. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt bb3e0900bb4afa55733df186a5ac2d4a1fbf48c73e1b7c4364f0fa2328c68be9, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 31835 tot 33111.