Citaat | Rechtbank Amsterdam 29 januari 2003

Alinea 32 Rechtbank Amsterdam 29 januari 2003

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Amsterdam 29 januari 2003, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2003:AF3760.

MR. LEVIN: Exactly. I had two points left to make, and that was one of them. So I will just focus on that one. That the U.S. does have an interest. As you said, it's a plenary proceeding. We are not suggesting that the litigation over the breach of contract and the consequences of that be heard in this Court. It will go to the arbitration, as provided in the contract. That arbitration has already started, interestingly, on the same day we filed the petition. But that arbitration has already started. The rejection of the contract is a step in the administration of the case, in a plenary case where we have to take a step to deal with the contract. The Debtor-in-Possession cannot take that step without Court approval. The Court has to rule. If the Court rules no, then it's effectively ruling to assume. So the Court is making a ruling to approve assumption or approve rejection. We think there are no grounds for assuming this contract here. Of course, Movieco would like to get paid, but that was to have the valid ground on --

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/cdfd9fac008f97d22c98984fe6311061b649f7bb31c811a6d8154b51c6d28542. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt cdfd9fac008f97d22c98984fe6311061b649f7bb31c811a6d8154b51c6d28542, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 11360 tot 12409.