Citaat | Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020

Onder 3.3.2 Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:2938.

37. Furthermore, the above provisions, taken together, aim at nullifying the effects of the CJEU ruling. This is a serious challenge to the principle of the primacy of EU law. In the preliminary ruling of 19 November 2019, the CJEU clearly held that it was a duty of the referring court to examine the question of independence of the Disciplinary Chamber, in particular by looking at the composition of the selecting body (the NCJ). Polish courts dealing with the consequences of the CJEU judgment of 19 November 2019 or confronted with an issue of judicial independence in a different context, will be put in an impossible position of choosing between following the requirements of the EU law as interpreted by the CJEU, or using legal avenues provided by the TFEU, and abiding by the new law.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/3185bfda7300cb1ee9020a576880f1858a54f61bc6bd2553f0a68e212804412a. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 3185bfda7300cb1ee9020a576880f1858a54f61bc6bd2553f0a68e212804412a, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 35832 tot 36700.