Citaat | Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020

Onder 3.3.2 Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Amsterdam 12 juni 2020, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:2938.

41. In addition, new Article 55 § 4 is contrary to the principle of a lawful judge (enshrined in to Article 6 § 1 of the ECHR and Article 47 of the Charter): it will be henceforth impossible to challenge a judge on the ground that the case has been allocated to him/her unlawfully and/or arbitrarily, or that the rules on territorial and substantive jurisdiction were breached. This provision may lead to abusive redistribution of cases to “loyal” judges. Such arbitrary allocation of cases is further facilitated by new provisions on the distribution of work-load in the courts which would increase the discretion of the court presidents (see, for example, new Article 22a, and new Article 37e §2), and the new rule de facto permitting allocation of cases to a judge from another district court (see new Article 77 § 9a which permits to delegate a judge of the district court to another court “simultaneously with performing duties in his official place” of work, i.e. in the district where this judge normally works).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/3185bfda7300cb1ee9020a576880f1858a54f61bc6bd2553f0a68e212804412a. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 3185bfda7300cb1ee9020a576880f1858a54f61bc6bd2553f0a68e212804412a, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 36773 tot 37878.