Citaat | Rechtbank Amsterdam 13 oktober 2020

Onder 4.19. Rechtbank Amsterdam 13 oktober 2020

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Amsterdam 13 oktober 2020, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:4966.

“That provision (artikel 10 EVRM, vzr.) , notwithstanding the acknowledged importance of freedom of expression, does not bestow any freedom of forum for the exercise of that right. While it is true that demographic, social, economic and technological developments are changing the ways in which people move around and come into contact with each other, the Court is not persuaded that this requires the automatic creation of rights of entry to private property, or even, necessarily, to all publicly owned property (government offices and ministries, for instance). Where, however, the bar on access to property has the effect of preventing any effective exercise of freedom of expression or it can be said that the essence of the right has been destroyed, the Court would not exclude that a positive obligation could arise for the State to protect the enjoyment of the Convention rights by regulating property rights.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d464b8ef1fe6003633b09f114decfb8d6894ce7ebc43762f862359efe44eaff0. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt d464b8ef1fe6003633b09f114decfb8d6894ce7ebc43762f862359efe44eaff0, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 38307 tot 39324.