Onder 6 Rechtbank Amsterdam 19 augustus 2021

In reply to the question set forth by the postponement decision of the District Court of Amsterdam dated 10 June 2021, we advise you that the judgement of the Court of Amsterdam according to which the requested person [opgeëiste persoon] could not have committed the criminal acts described in the European Arrest Warrant number 07/2020, does not affect in any whatsoever way the force and validity of the E.A.W. issued, which continues being effective, on the grounds that it has been issued by an Independent Judicia! Authority on the basis of the Principle of Proportionality and because there was sufficient indication of guilt of the requested person from all the evidence existing in the legal file, which were co-assessed and may not be reversed on the grounds only of the defense allegations of the accused person before the Dutch Court, and by producing to such court documents, that do not identify with complete certainty that the accused person [opgeëiste persoon] is the one and same person as the person declared on 12 November 2020 at 10:04 at the [naam asielzoekerscentrum] , given that neither were fingerprints taken nor are there pictures of camera at the above service.

$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/ae2d14aa131ac5bb92333c1c7ac69e006638963b2cd21b5aaaa885906cadd3a2 | shasum -a 256