Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014

Onder 4.33. Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2014:8748.

In the Nuhanović and Mustafić cases the Supreme Court ruled that the criterion for attributing Dutchbat’s actions to the State is whether the State exercised effective control over said actions. The Supreme Court derives this criterion from Section 7 of the Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organisations (hereinafter to be referred to as: DARIO) that the International Law Organisation (ILO) has drawn up. In the cases referred to the Appeals Court considered that though this provision of effective control is only mentioned in relation to attribution to the UN the same criterion holds when answering the question whether actions of troops must be attributed to the state that placed them at the disposal of others. The Supreme Court considered that the ILO’s DARIO recommendations and the Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (hereinafter to be referred to as: DARS) may generally be accepted as a reflection of current, unwritten international law and were apparently accepted as such even in 1995.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/c6804d5f796483ea58a41625e239378c1e84c34dcccce3ca6ca3a4fe842549c3. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt c6804d5f796483ea58a41625e239378c1e84c34dcccce3ca6ca3a4fe842549c3, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 87225 tot 88480.