Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014

Onder 4.99. Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 16 juli 2014, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2014:8748.

4.143. Claimants further emphasise that the Government of The Netherlands did submit a notice of objection to the text of Draft Resolution 1004 in which it was written “ to use all resources available” and had a preference for the form of words “to use his best efforts” and The Netherlands in connection with this withdrew as co-sponsor of this resolution that on July 12th 1995 was adopted unanimously. This position of the Government of The Netherlands provides no evidence of effective control just as the assessment of Van Kappen the Dutch military advisor to the Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali to the effect that the recapture of Srebrenica from both a military and a political point of view was not feasible. Van Kappen acted as an official of the UN. It has not been argued nor proven that the Government of The Netherlands influenced his estimation in any way. As previously explained the fact that Van Kappen is a Dutch national in no way implies that the State exercised effective control or that Van Kappen’s estimation is attributable to the State.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/c6804d5f796483ea58a41625e239378c1e84c34dcccce3ca6ca3a4fe842549c3. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt c6804d5f796483ea58a41625e239378c1e84c34dcccce3ca6ca3a4fe842549c3, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 187248 tot 188472.