Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 24 juni 2015

Onder 4.43. Rechtbank Den Haag 24 juni 2015

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 24 juni 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196.

This does not affect the the fact that a state can be supposed to want to meet its international-law obligations. From this it follows that an international-law standard – a statutory provision or an unwritten legal standard – may not be explained or applied in a manner which would mean that the state in question has violated an international-law obligation, unless no other interpretation or application is possible. This is a generally acknowledged rule in the legal system. This means that when applying and interpreting national-law open standards and concepts, including social proprietary, reasonableness and propriety, the general interest or certain legal principles, the court takes account of such international-law obligations. This way, these obligations have a “reflex effect” in national law.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/5d7ca323e4df9e1a4dce2ddb9ffaaa9620ca24f29dd715fb6874941457e35275. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 5d7ca323e4df9e1a4dce2ddb9ffaaa9620ca24f29dd715fb6874941457e35275, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 190187 tot 191030.