Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 23 maart 2018

Onder 2.2 Rechtbank Den Haag 23 maart 2018

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 23 maart 2018, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2018:4331.

186. In the context of these procedures, it is for the applicants to adduce evidence capable of demonstrating that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if the measure complained of were to be implemented, they would be exposed to a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see Saadi, cited above, § 129, and F.G. v. Sweden, cited above, § 120). In this connection it should be observed that a certain degree of speculation is inherent in the preventive purpose of Article 3 and that it is not a matter of requiring the persons concerned to provide clear proof of their claim that they would be exposed to proscribed treatment (see, in particular, Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 130, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/004e6fd4bf9d6565a4644ad68433ab17b235683b871843338528cdd75963a88a. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 004e6fd4bf9d6565a4644ad68433ab17b235683b871843338528cdd75963a88a, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 22019 tot 22781.