Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 11 september 2019
Onder 4.4.1 Rechtbank Den Haag 11 september 2019
Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 11 september 2019, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2019:10650.
According to the medical file of the patient the accused has had contact with the patient several times and observed her several times for a longer period. The patient was also filmed (with authorization of the husband and the daughter) to record her behaviour. Furthermore the accused reviewed the general practitioners’ medical file of the patient, including inter alia, specialist reports of the patients’ geriatrician. The accused also consulted the general practitioner of the patient, the nursing staff of the nursing home, the husband and the daughter, the patients’ psychologist and with a consultant of the ‘end-of-life clinic’. On 29 March 2016 this consultant had contact with the patient and observed her and concluded based on this that the patient had no awareness of illness and was not mentally competent. The consultant also checked the due care criteria for euthanasia with the accused. Furthermore the accused consulted a SCEN physician [SCEN= support and consultation for euthanasia in the Netherlands] and a SCEN physician internist (hereafter also: the SCEN physicians) independently of each other.
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d2ceeb246b82b390e688b0c010cf8d30fc0d854334e03015e3e092670504e1df. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt d2ceeb246b82b390e688b0c010cf8d30fc0d854334e03015e3e092670504e1df, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 41401 tot 42643.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d2ceeb246b82b390e688b0c010cf8d30fc0d854334e03015e3e092670504e1df | shasum -a 256