Citaat | Rechtbank Den Haag 14 oktober 2020

Onder 2.21. Rechtbank Den Haag 14 oktober 2020

Een alinea uit Rechtbank Den Haag 14 oktober 2020, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:10160.

Obviously, Sandoz disagrees with the Hague District Court 's decision, and we have filed an appeal on Sandoz' behalf in the Netherlands (by writ of 11 May 2012). Sandoz is of the opinion that your client should not be entitled to enforce EP (NL) 364 in the meantime. However, Sandoz also realizes that when your client would invoke EP (NL) 364 against Sandoz pending appeal, the (PI Judge of the) Hague District Court will most likely grant an injunction, because he/she will most likely have to defer to the 7 March 2012 decision. If the Court of Appeal invalidates (with retro-active effect) the relevant claims of EP (NL) 364 on appeal, your client would then be liable for the damage Sandoz incurs resulting from keeping Sandoz off the Dutch market.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/cdaffb8fd5469161d3454e2ae6632b9097d48a53b75f944a5fe32fca849cd272. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt cdaffb8fd5469161d3454e2ae6632b9097d48a53b75f944a5fe32fca849cd272, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 20024 tot 20847.