Citaat | Raad van State 25 maart 2015

Alinea 41 Raad van State 25 maart 2015

Een alinea uit Raad van State 25 maart 2015, ECLI:NL:RVS:2015:1044.

108. Another important consideration is whether family life was created at a time when the persons involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host State would from the outset be precarious. It is the Court’s well-established case-law that, where this is the case, it is likely only to be in exceptional circumstances that the removal of the non-national family member will constitute a violation of Article 8 (see Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 94, § 68; Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998; Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999; M. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25087/06, 24 June 2008; Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, cited above, § 39; Arvelo Aponte v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 57-58; and Butt v. Norway, cited above, § 78).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afaaa52a81e9643807c9a60631aca53dd14185d7a4a58d4f5d88f496b9b3c88b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt afaaa52a81e9643807c9a60631aca53dd14185d7a4a58d4f5d88f496b9b3c88b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 17360 tot 18362.