Citaat | Raad van State 25 maart 2015
Alinea 46 Raad van State 25 maart 2015
Een alinea uit Raad van State 25 maart 2015, ECLI:NL:RVS:2015:1044.
116. The Court considers that a second important feature of the instant case is the fact that the applicant has been in the Netherlands for more than sixteen years and that she has no criminal record. Although she failed to comply with the obligation to leave the Netherlands, her presence was nevertheless tolerated for a considerable period of time by the Netherlands authorities, while she repeatedly submitted residence requests and awaited the outcome of appeals. The tolerance of her presence for such a lengthy period of time, during which for a large part it was open to the authorities to remove her, in effect enabled the applicant to establish and develop strong family, social and cultural ties in the Netherlands. The applicant’s address, where she has been living for the last fifteen years, has always been known to the Netherlands authorities.
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afaaa52a81e9643807c9a60631aca53dd14185d7a4a58d4f5d88f496b9b3c88b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt afaaa52a81e9643807c9a60631aca53dd14185d7a4a58d4f5d88f496b9b3c88b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 19744 tot 20618.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afaaa52a81e9643807c9a60631aca53dd14185d7a4a58d4f5d88f496b9b3c88b | shasum -a 256